Legal Opinion

Benon John Trawinski, Irene Monahan Trawinski v. United Technologies, Carrier Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 3, 2002No. 02-13276PublishedCited by 55 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Benon and Irene Trawinski appeal the district court’s order dismissing their pro se complaint for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). They argue that the district court improperly found (1) that their Energy and Policy Conservation Act (EPCA), 42 U.S.C. § 6292 et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) claims were barred by the applicable statutes of limitations and (2) that the court lacked subject matter jurisdietion over the § 1985(3) claim. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM.

I. BACKGROUND

A new heating and air conditioning unit, manufactured by appellee Carrier…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Tannenbaum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  5. Bray v. Alexandria Women's Health ClinicSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Trevis Caldwell v. Warden, FCI TalladegaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  2. Kristin Sconiers v. FNU LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  3. Cook v. Randolph County, Ga.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  4. Stephen Cox v. Hon. Frank Mills, IIICourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. HuffDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2010

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API