Legal Opinion
United States v. Anderson
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 29, 1986No. CR-86-0150 WHO, CR-86-0151 WHO, CR-86-0157 WHO and CR-86-0159 WHOPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ORRICK, District Judge.
In four separate indictments, defendants Robert D. Anderson, Earl S. Bowser, John and Laura Hatcher, and Roscoe L. Little-field, have been charged with manufacturing marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a). In connection therewith, the government has alleged that certain parcels of real property were used and intended to be used to commit and facilitate the commission of each offense, in order to subject defendants’ interests in the respective parcels of real property to forfeiture to the United States pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(a)(2). Each of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Michael G. Thevis, Alton Bart Hood, Global Industries, Inc., Anna Jeanette EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. EnmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Greenwood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Roscoe L. LittlefieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Alvin D. McKeithen Sr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Premises and Real Property at 250 Kreag Rd.District Court, W.D. New York · 1990