Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Havins

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 30, 1980No. 9016PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

COUNTISS, Justice.

Upon further consideration, we conclude that appellants’ motion for rehearing should be granted in part. We, therefore, withdraw our opinion of November 20, 1979, set aside our judgment and substitute this opinion.

K. A. T. Corporation, Richard V. Anderson, Marjorie H. Harrison, Omard R. Harrison and L. V. Anderson initiated suit against Truman C. Havins 1 to recover funds placed in escrow by Havins under a real estate contract, contending that Havins breached the contract and forfeited the escrow money by refusing to close the transaction. Havins…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. C. & R. TRANSPORT, INC. v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Woods v. LittletonTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Stahl Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Joseph v. PPG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  2. Veale v. Rose, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
  3. Arete Partners, L.P. v. GunnermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  4. Grohn v. MarquardtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. Rutherford v. Whataburger, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API