Legal Opinion

McDougald v. Imler

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 29, 1943PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This suit is here for the third time. See McDougald v. Couey, 145 Fla. 689, 200 So. 391; McDougald v. Couey, 150 Fla. 748, 9 So. 187. Pending the second appeal here the plaintiff died and his daughter, Ruby Mae Imler, was appointed administratrix of his estate and was substituted as plaintiff. An amended declaration was filed alleging gross negligence as provided in Section 320.59, Fla. Stats. 1941, pursuant to an order of the lower court.

Gross negligence or wanton and wilful misconduct as charged in the amended declaration, consisted of driving the Ford automobile at a reckless and dangerous…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McDougald v. CoueySupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  2. McDougald v. CoueySupreme Court of Florida · 1941

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. v. JanssensDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Margaret Ann Super Markets, Inc. v. SchollSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
  3. Haverty Furniture Co. v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1944
  4. Hollingsworth v. Arcadia Citrus Growers Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  5. Abbe v. AbbeSupreme Court of Florida · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API