In re Sam "F." & Bobby "S."
New York City Family Court
1Opinion of the Court
Mtt,t,atu> L. Midonick, J.
The sole object of this opinion is to expose again, and to persuade the Legislature to rectify, the miserable state of the law in respect to the requirement for corroboration in cases of sexual assault.
*245On June 24, 1971, at about 1:00 p.m. the complainant, an attractive fashion model, aged 19, was crossing through Morning-side Park, on her way to a street corner modelling engagement at 116th Street and Broadway, when she was attacked by three juveniles. The boys, the two before me being about six feet tall, threatened the young woman with a knife and a razor causing…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- People v. . PageNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- State v. HilliardArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. PerezIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
- Day v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. LinzyNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- People v. ScarposiCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1972
- In re Jose G.New York City Family Court · 1972
- People v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- People v. FordCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.