Legal Opinion

St. Martin v. Skamania Boom Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1914No. 11407PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Ska-mania county, McKenney, J., entered February 13, 1913, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for an injunction, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

The plaintiffs, as owners and tenants in common of certain lands in Skamania county, brought this action to secure a permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the natural flow of the waters of Wind river across those lands. The plaintiffs claim title as the widow and heirs at law of the original homesteader, Isadore St. Martin, who died intestate in 1910. On the land in question, is a valuable mineral spring of hot water, which flows from the ground within a few feet of the edge of the waters of Wind river at its ordinary stage. This spring has an established…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Hall v. BlackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Roe v. Howard CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Nicomen Boom Co. v. North Shore Boom & Driving Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Eells v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Northwest Cities Gas Co. v. Western Fuel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Myers v. Little Church by the Side of the RoadWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. McInnis v. Day Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Martin v. BurrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Murphy v. Calispel Duck ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API