Legal Opinion

Freiberg v. Freiberg

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1889No. 6262PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Johnson. Tried below before Hon. J. M. Hall. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Chief Justice.

This action was brought by appellant against Ben Freiberg to recover a sum alleged to be due on a promissory note executed by the latter to the former.

An attachment was sued out and levied on a stock of goods. After-wards Joseph H. Brown and Freiberg, Klein & Co. each caused the same property to be attached to secure debts due to them by Ben Freiberg, and having obtained judgments each intervened, alleging the existence of their judgments against Ben Freiberg just, due, and unpaid; the insolvency of Ben Freiberg; that the claim of appellant was fictitious and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hale v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Gibbons v. BresslerIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  3. J. H. Johnson & Co. v. HeidenheimerTexas Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dodd v. GainesTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Cleveland v. Empire MillsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  3. Kraus v. HaasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API