Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Dascomb v. Board of Tax Appeals of the United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 6, 1926No. 4504PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBB, Associate Justice.
Appeal from a judgment for tbe defendant in the Supreme Court of tbe District of Columbia dismissing tbe petition of tbe plaintiffs, appellants here, for a writ of mandamus to require the defendant, appellee here, to take jurisdiction of petitioners’ appeal from a decision of tbe Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
Tbe facts are not in dispute and are as follows: On November 18, 1924, tbe Commissioner notified plaintiff by registered mail that its claim for abatement (section 279 [a] of the Revenue Act of 1924, 43 Stat. 300, being Comp. St. § 6336Vezz[6]) would be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Louisville Cement Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. United States Ex Rel. Humboldt Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Kingman v. Western Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- United States v. EllicottSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- United States Ex Rel. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Southland Industries, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Burnet v. Lexington Ice & Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
- Black River Valley Broadcasts, Inc. v. McNinchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- WP Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Com'r of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- KFAB Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.