Town of New Holstein v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentEschweiler, J.
{dissenting). Appellant town, the designated agent of the state for that purpose, was performing the governmental duty of repairing the public highway, and for negligence in so doing there is no liability to respond in damages except by express statute. Uecker v. Clyman, 137 Wis. 38, 39, 118 N. W. 247; Bremer v. Milwaukee, 166 Wis. 164, 167, 164 N. W. 840.
Only because there was no prior written permit authorizing the employment of the minor by the town, it is now compelled to .pay treble compensation, and this under sub. (7) (a), sec. 102.09, Stats., providing for such treble damages if the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Milwaukee v. McGregorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- State v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Sullivan v. School District No. 1 of the City of TomahWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Brenner v. HerubenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Rusk Farm Drainage District v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.