Legal Opinion
Fisco v. Clark
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided May 18, 1966PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMMOND, J. (Pro Tempore).
The plaintiff is in custody pursuant to a Governor’s warrant of extradition, being accused of committing a murder in Louisiana. He seeks to resist his extradition and to obtain his release from the defendant sheriff by a petition for writ of habeas corpus. The trial court having denied the writ, the plaintiff appeals to this court claiming error in two particulars.
It appears from the trial record that one W. A. Jarmon is alleged to have been murdered in Richland Parish, Louisiana on July 16, 1964. An Assistant District Attorney appeared before a judge of the District…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sweeney v. WoodallSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Pierce v. CreecySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Matter of StraussSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Audler v. KrissCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
- Ex Parte PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Salvail v. SharkeySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
- Snyder v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. FoxOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- King v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.