Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Townsend

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 6, 1992No. 185PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

In this appeal from Judgment of Sentence, we are asked to review the trial court’s determination that breathalyzer test results were properly admitted at trial. George M. Townsend contends that the procedures employed in operating the testing equipment were in violation of applicable regulations. We conclude that Townsend was entitled to suppression of the test results, finding that the trial court erred in its determination that the Commonwealth had carried its burden of demonstrating compliance with the regulations. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

On June…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ThillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. ShifflerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DemorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Commonwealth v. StarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. C. Staller v. Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2026
  4. Commonwealth v. Shade, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Snyder County1995
  5. Commonwealth v. TownsendSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API