Legal Opinion

Correa v. Curbey

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 26, 1979No. 2 CA-CIV 3035PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

The principal issue presented on appeal by plaintiffs/appellants is whether the trial court committed reversible error in refusing to instruct the jury on strict liability. We find that it did and reverse.

The Correas brought this action against appellees Curbey for damages to their residence and well as a result of alleged blasting operations conducted by the Curbeys on their adjoining property. The testimony was conflicting as to whether any explosions had in fact occurred and the jury • returned a defense verdict. Plaintiffs claim error in the refusal to give certain…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Loe Et Ux v. LenhardOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Exner v. Sherman Power Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  3. Spano v. Perini Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Barnum v. Rural Fire Protection CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. Nichols v. BakerArizona Supreme Court · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ernest Quiroz Et Ux v. Alcoa IncArizona Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Andrews v. Fry's Food Stores of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  3. Dyer v. Maine Drilling & Blasting, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  4. Cordova v. ParrettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. Starr v. CamposCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API