Legal Opinion

Hatfield v. Workman

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1891PublishedCited by 10 opinions

cited 27 W.-Ya. 75; 25 W. Ya. 227 ; Id. 692, 708; 24 W. Ya. 354 ; 129 CJ. S. 689 ; 21 W. Ya. 709. cited 2 W. Ya. 285 ; 14 W. Ya. 177; 9 W. Ya. 438; 3 W. Ya. 335; 32 W.' Ya. 488.

1Opinion of the Court

English, Judge :

This was an action of trespass, brought by William Hatfield against William Workman, James Pugh, and A. W. Forsythe, in the Circuit Court of Boone county, to recover damages for cutting down and destroying one curly walnut tree of the alleged value of two thousand dollars, and underwood of various kinds of the alleged value of five hun-*579clred dollars, then and there growiug, standing, and being in and upon a certain tract of land there situate, of which the plaintiff was seised and possessed, and taking and carrying away the same, and converting and disposing thereof to their…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wandling v. StrawWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Gwynn v. SchwartzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Schraeder Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. PackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. White v. WardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Carrico v. West Virginia Cent. & P. R'y Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Teass v. City of St. AlbansWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Bell v. Huntington Development & Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Miller v. Shenandoah Pulp Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Idaho Land Co. v. ParsonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API