Legal Opinion

State v. Young

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 12, 1995No. 94-1295PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The State appeals an order granting defendant’s motion for protective order. Because this order is non-appealable, Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(c), we treat the appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari, State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250 (Fla.1988), and deny the petition.

Contrary to the state’s allegations, the trial court did not depart from the essential requirements of law in conducting an in camera hearing to determine whether the witness’s proffered testimony would divulge information protected by the attorney-client privilege. Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220(m)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Combs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. State v. PettisSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Cruse v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  4. Superior Ins. Co. v. HoldenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  5. Zanardi v. ZanardiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. PinderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Little v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API