Legal Opinion

Zdunek v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided February 20, 2013No. Docket No. 27966-10SUnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JANE E. ZDUNEK, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Zdunek v. Comm'r

Docket No. 27966-10S

United States Tax Court

T.C. Summary Opinion 2013-13; 2013 Tax Ct. Summary LEXIS 13;

February 20, 2013, Filed

PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b), THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.

Decision will be entered under Rule 155.

Jane E. Zdunek, Pro se.

Robert J. Braxton, for respondent.

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge.

ARMEN

SUMMARY OPINION

ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. HIGBEE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUEUnited States Tax Court · 2001
  3. Estate of Horvath v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
  4. Joseph F. Purcell, Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. Estate of Emerson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jane E. Zdunek v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API