Legal Opinion
Boyd v. Cebalo
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 16, 2016No. 2015-CA-1085PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROLAND L. BELSOME, Judge.
11 This appeal arises from the trial court’s grant of an exception of no cause of action, dismissing the plaintiffs claims against the Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund (Tulane) with prejudice. For the reasons that follow we reverse and remand.
As a student of Tulane, Stephanie Boyd resided in a dormitory on campus. Her residence was a two-room suite that was adjoined by a shared bathroom. The defendant Andrew Cébalo was also a Tulane student. Mr. Cébalo was a guest of one of Ms. Boyd’s suitemates. Mr. Cébalo accessed Ms. Boyd’s room through the adjoining…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Posecai v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
- Williams v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Winstead v. KenyonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Hall v. BOARD OF SUP'RS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITYLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chatman v. Southern University at New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC v. PorterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Chatman v. Southern University at New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Henry W. Kinney v. the Biodistrict New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2024
- Louis Petkovich, Jr. and Julie D. Petkovich v. Franklin Homes, Inc., Gulf Coast Mobile Homes, Inc., Landry Mobile Home Transporters, Inc., and Nta, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.