Legal Opinion
Price v. Worldvision Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 24, 1978No. 74 Civ. 748-CSHPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HAIGHT, District Judge:
Plaintiffs Lucille Hardy Price (“Mrs. Price”), Ida K. Laurel (“Mrs. Laurel”) and Larry Harmon Pictures Corporation (“Harmon”) commenced this action for injunctive relief and damages against defendants Worldvision Enterprises, Inc. (“Worldvision”) and Mermac Productions, Ltd. (“Mermac”). Mrs. Price and Mrs. Laurel are the widows and beneficiaries, respectively, of those noted comedians of yesteryear, Oliver Hardy (“Hardy”) and Stanley Laurel (“Laurel”). Harmon is engaged in the business of promoting and distributing films and of licensing toys…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Perma Research and Development Company v. The Singer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Factors Etc., Inc. And Boxcar Enterprises Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc. And Stop and Shop Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Litchfield v. Goodnow's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- James W. Herendeen v. Champion International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Kennett-Murray Corporation v. John E. BoneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation v. Esprit De Corp. And Federated Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- W.C. Lane, Jr. v. Celotex Corporation, Keene CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Estate of Presley v. RussenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
- Jeffreys v. RossiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.