Legal Opinion

Marx v. Katz

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

Upon the foregoing papers this motion by defendant to dismiss the action on the ground of forum non conveniens, or, in the alternative, for an order requiring plaintiff to post security for costs, is denied.

This action has been brought by an assignee to recover the sum of $10,000 alleged to have been loaned to defendant by plaintiff’s assignor. Plaintiff is an attorney at law and is a practitioner in this State. She swears that, while she has an “address”, a “domiciliary residence ”, in New Hampshire, her “ actual ” “ home ” “ dwelling ” is at 4621 Waldo Avenue, The Bronx, New York.

Under the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morek v. SmolakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thomson v. Continental InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Evyan Perfumes, Inc. v. HamiltonNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API