Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Employer's Insurance of Wausau v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 2, 1978No. 56351Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

McMurray, Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting ..in part.

This case involves the doctrine of concurrent similar employment by the claimants’ decedent for two separate employers. In this instance a pulpwood worker (claimants’ decedent) who was employed as a "slasher operator” in cutting up whole trees was also employed by one of the independent contractors to that worker’s prime employer in the cutting of pulpwood. The evidence disclosed that neither of these jobs was considered high risk, although this worker was killed on the job. As a slasher operator he cut up the trees or logs being…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. St Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co. v. IdovCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  2. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co. v. IdovSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. WaltersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. United States Fire Insurance v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API