Legal Opinion · Dissent

Salzl v. Gibson Greeting Cards, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1980No. 79-516Published

1DissentHolmes, J.

I am compelled to dissent from the majority herein for a number of reasons which I herewith set forth. I recognize and approve of the validity of the position of labor unions in representing employees in negotiating *40labor contracts including beneficial pension plans. I also approve of the holding in Marcum v. Ohio Match Co. (1965), 4 Ohio App. 2d 95, that an employee is bound by the mandatory retirement provisions in a collective bargaining agreement negotiated on his behalf by his agent, the union, and being so bound has “quit his work without just cause or has been discharged for just cause…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marcum v. Ohio Match Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. May Department Stores Co. v. Board of Review-Ohio Bureau of Employment ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API