Legal Opinion

Burns v. Consol Pennsylvania Coal Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 11, 1994Published

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order enjoining appellant Consol Pennsylvania Coal Company [“Consol”] from mining coal under four tracts of land owned by appellees, Carl and Nancy Burns [“the Burns”]. The dispute in this case boils down to whether the Pennsylvania Bituminous Mine Subsidence and Land Conservation Act, 52 Pa.S.A. § 1406.1, et seq. [hereinafter “the Subsidence Act” or “the Act”], requires Consol to include on a map its support plan for an undeveloped tract of land which is owed the right to support. The trial court held that Consol must indicate such support and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Elkin v. Bell Tel. Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Ohio Casualty Group of Insurance Companies v. Argonaut InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. DeLuca v. Buckeye Coal CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Albig v. MUN. AUTH. OF WESTMORELAND CTY.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Worley v. AugustineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API