Legal Opinion

Auritt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 13, 2007No. 1D06-5700PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant challenges the trial court’s order denying his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion. Pursuant to a nolo contendere plea, the appellant was convicted of lewd or lascivious conduct in the presence of a child under sixteen and was required to register as a sex offender. The appellant served his sentence, but was again incarcerated for failure to re-register within 48 hours of an address change based on the foregoing conviction. He filed the present motion attacking his original conviction on grounds of newly discovered evidence. The lower tribunal dismissed the motion…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wood v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Stephens v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  3. McArthur v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  5. Wall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Turner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  2. Harry L. Good v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API