Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Port Arthur

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 29, 1933No. 2440PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’QUINN, Justice.

Appellant sued appellee to recover in the sum of $2,253.74. He alleged that certain persons, formerly employees of the city of Port Arthur, had assigned to him their salaries for the last half of the month of March, 1932, and which the said city had failed to pay, setting out the amount claimed to be due each individual. Appellant alleged that said employees were employed by the city by the month, and that their month began on the first of the month and ended on the last day of each month; that they worked until the 16th of March, when they were discharged by the city of Port…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Globe Indemnity Co. v. BarnesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. City of Abilene v. SaylesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  3. State Ex Rel. Strait v. BrooksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Overton v. City of AustinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  2. Germany v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  3. City of Groves v. PonderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  4. Garza v. Garcia, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
  5. Plainos v. HouchinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API