Legal Opinion
Rowland v. King County
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided August 18, 2025No. 2:24-cv-01240Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 ESTATE OF MICHAEL ROWLAND, by CASE NO. 2:24-cv-01240-LK 11 and through its personal representative, Karen Rowland, and in her individual ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ 12 capacity, et al., MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT 13 Plaintiffs, v. 14 KING COUNTY et al., 15 16 Defendants. 17 18 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ “Motion for Leave to Amend and Second 19 Amended Complaint and Add Additional Defendants.” Dkt. No. 56. Defendants oppose the 20 motion. Dkt. Nos. 57, 59. For the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Lockheed Martin Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Network Solutions, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Larry Efosa BAZUAYE, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. HarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.