Legal Opinion

McWhorter v. Williams

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 24, 1934No. 7 Div. 247PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

Complainants seek injunctive relief against the further prosecution of damage suits by defendants in the courts of Tennessee; the collision out of which these suits arose having occurred in Alabama where defendants reside.

The equity of the bill is primarily rested upon the case of Weaver v. Ala. Great Southern R. R. Co., 200 Ala. 432, 76 So. 364, in which was the holding that where both parties to an action in a sister state are residents of this state, a court of equity may here act in personam and enjoin further prosecution of such suit, where its purpose is to evade the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Davis v. Farmers Co-Operative Equity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Michigan Central Railroad v. MixSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Hoffman v. Missouri Ex Rel. ForakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harbin v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. PopeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  3. Boston & Maine Railroad v. WhiteheadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Evans v. MorrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Riddick v. American Employers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API