Neumayer v. Philadelphia Indemnity
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE HEARN :
**263 In this case, we decide whether notice clauses in automobile insurance policies are rendered meaningless by *407 Section 38-77-142(C) of the South Carolina Code (2015) 1 . The trial court found the clause in this policy 2 void and accordingly required the insurance company to pay the full default judgment entered against its insured. The insurer appealed, and we now reverse.
FACTS
On January 25, 2013, a bus driven by Defendant Asia Partman struck Respondent Andrew Neumayer while he was **264 a pedestrian in Cayce, South Carolina. EMS transported Neumayer to Lexington Medical…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Town of Summerville v. City of North CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- B.L.G. Enterprises, Inc. v. First Financial InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Williams v. Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Faizan v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Edgefield Mfg. Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Covil Corporation v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2024
- Covil Corporation v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2024
- Diane Benevento v. Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
- Koppers Performance Chemicals Inc v. Travelers Indemnity Company, TheDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022
- Koppers Performance Chemicals Inc v. Travelers Indemnity Company, TheDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.