State of Minnesota v. Brittny Nicole Ziegler
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LARKIN, Judge.
Appellant challenges her convictions of criminal vehicular operation and reckless driving. She argues that the admission of data collected from a sensing and diagnostic module in her vehicle violated her right to confrontation under the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Because the data are not testimonial statements within the meaning of the Confrontation Clause, we affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Brittny Nicole Ziegler was driving eastbound on Highway 14, a two-lane road in Olmsted County. A Ford Focus passed Ziegler’s vehicle and then passed another vehicle in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- State v. CaulfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. MoonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State of Maine v. Clifton ThomasSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025
- Com. v. Thompson, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
- Com. v. Thompson, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
- Jason Baldwin v. Commonwealth of KentuckyKentucky Supreme Court · 2025
- Rueben Justin Trejo v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.