Fluckiger v. Haber
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Christopher Haber and another, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 25th day of January, 1911, denying the defendants’ motion to change the place of trial.
1Opinion of the Court
McLaughlin, J.:
In May, 1910, the plaintiff was a passenger on a steam yacht on Rondout creek, Ulster county, which was owned by the *66defendant Haber. The yacht landed at a dock owned by the Cornell Steamboat Company for the purpose of letting the plaintiff and others go ashore. After the plaintiff had left the yacht, and while walking upon the dock she stepped into a hole and sustained personal injuries, and to recover the damages alleged to have been sustained by reason thereof, she brought this action—the venue being laid in the county of New York. The theory upon which a recovery is sought…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jacobs v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
3Cited by6 opinions
- Slavin v. WhispellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- Ackerman v. CummiskeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Rose v. Town of RichmondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Fluckiger v. HaberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Marsoff v. FastNew York Supreme Court · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.