Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Reichelderfer

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 23, 1932No. 5274PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the lower eourt ratifying and confirming the verdict of a jury in a condemnation ease.

*417On May 13, 1928, the commissioners of the District of Columbia filed a petition under the provisions of subchaptor 1 of chapter 15 of the Code of Laws for the District of Columbia (D. C. Code 1929, T. 25, § 52 ct seq.), seeking the condemnation of land for •flie extension of Irving street between Eighteenth and Twentieth Streets Northeast, and for the widening of Eighteenth street between Irving and Jackson Streets Northeast.

Among the lands sought to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Wight v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Wilkinson v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. James Leo Huth v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. McGraw Electric Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1954
  3. Johnson & Wimsatt, Inc. v. HazenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  4. Continental Bank v. National City BankDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1965
  5. Nealy v. HazenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API