Legal Opinion

Murray v. Oliver

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1869PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Benton County. The facts are stated in tlie opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBoise, J.

This is a suit to foreclose a mortgage executed by the respondent, Oliver, July 26th, 1861, to-one Ira Bristol, and by him assigned, for value, to the appellants, July 15th, 1862.

The complaint sets forth the note and mortgage upon which this suit is based, and the respondent Oliver demurs, and assigns as ground of demurrer, that the said note is usurious and void. The court below sustained the demurrer, and gave a decree for the defendants for costs.

The note which is claimed to be usurious is as follows:

“$200.00.
“Benton County, Oregon, July 26th, 1861.
“ One year after date, for value…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Townsend v. CorningNew York Supreme Court · 1847

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Southwell v. BeezleyOregon Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Levens v. BriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Miami Exporting Co. v. Bank of the United StatesOhio Supreme Court · 1833

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API