Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Martha Nathan v. William French Smith, U.S. Attorney General. Martha Nathan v. William French Smith, U.S. Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 14, 1984No. 83-1619, 83-1643Published

1ConcurrenceBork, Circuit Judge

This is a case over which we have no jurisdiction: the Ethics in Government Act creates no private right of action to compel the Attorney General to conduct a preliminary investigation. We may not, therefore, reach the merits and inquire, as Judge Davis does, whether appellees supplied the Attorney General with information sufficiently specific to trigger a duty on his part to initiate a preliminary investigation.

Though he concedes that there are “substantial questions” about plaintiffs’ standing to sue under the Act and about the judicial reviewability of the Attorney General’s actions and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Linda R. S. v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API