O'Sullivan v. O'Sullivan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: Plaintiff waived his Statute of Limitations defense by failing to raise it in a timely manner (see, CPLR 3211 [e]; Matter of Augenblick v Town of Cortlandt, 66 NY2d 775, 777, rearg denied 67 NY2d 647; Itzkowitz v Town Bd., 139 AD2d 932). Plaintiff’s argument that the provisions of CPLR 3211 are inapplicable to this *961proceeding, in reliance on Consentino v Sweeney (143 AD2d 971), is not properly before us because that argument is raised for the first time in plaintiffs reply brief. "The practice of raising a new substantive issue in a reply brief at a time when an adversary can no…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. LiMauroNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. LiMauroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Szigyarto v. SzigyartoNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Augenblick v. Town of CortlandtNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Nemia v. NemiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Turner v. CanaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re Yorimar K.-M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Greene v. Xerox Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Mesiti v. MongielloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People ex rel. Hinton v. GrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.