Legal Opinion

Seidler v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 12, 2015No. 1D14-2569PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBilbrey, J.

Appellants, the Seidlers, appeal the amended final judgment of foreclosure, which included the trial court’s finding of standing based on Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s reestablishment of a lost note. Because the record does not contain sufficient evidence to support reestablishment of .the lost page of: .the note or to prove ■ the original plaintiffs, standing to enforce the note at the time the foreclosure action was filed, the evidence is insufficient to support the amended final judgment, and we therefore reverse.

“The standard of this court’s review of the evidence to prove standing to bring a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McLean v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. Focht v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. Kiefert v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  4. Correa v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  5. Rigby v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Home Outlet, LLC v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  2. Brian and Cynthia Poag v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. Kyser v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  4. Wells Fargo Delaware Trust Company, N.A. v. PetrovDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  5. Brian and Cynthia Poag v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API