Legal Opinion

Horowitz v. Welt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The purchaser at the foreclosure sale purchased only such right, title and interest as the mortgagee had in the premises. (Central Union Gas Co. v. Browning, 210 N. Y. 10.) The mortgage was made prior to the conditional sale of the alleged chattels and, therefore, was not made upon the faith and credit thereof. The purchaser at foreclosure, therefore, took subject to the conditional sales agreement. (Kohler Co., Inc., v. Brasun, 222 App. Div. 338.) The plaintiff testified that the fixtures in question could be removed without serious damage to the realty. The defendant offered no direct proof…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Central Union Gas Co. v. . BrowningNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Kohler Co. v. BrasunAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. American Trust Co. v. 22 West 25th Street Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API