Mahin v. Mahin
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
In this case the appeal is from an order striking portions of the answer. Motion was granted to strike paragraphs 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 and 16 of the answer.
Paragraph 2 of the answer was: “Defendant denies each and every and all and singular the allegations set out in folio 2 of the amended bill of complaint.”
Paragraphs 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 and 16 were identical with paragraph. 2 except that each referred to a like plea folio of the amended bill of complaint.
“Folio” as used in the pleading, refers to a division in a document for the purpose of measurement or .reference. See New Merriam-Webster…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Aikens v. City of RockledgeSupreme Court of Florida · 1938