Legal Opinion

Blair v. Cassin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1898No. 2880PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County. — Hon. Wm. E. Richardson, Judge.

1Per curiam

Respondent moves to affirm the judgment herein and for damages because of the failure of the appellant to prosecute his appeal within the time provided by statute. The motion to affirm must he granted, there having been no cause shown for the failure to comply with the statute in filing briefs and sending up the transcript. But it appears that by the judgment in the lower court the appellant was ordered to surrender the possession of certain real estate and that in appealing therefrom he gave a supersedeas bond, hut, as we cannot determine from the record what amount of damages should be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Northwestern & Pacific Hypotheek Bank v. GriffittsWashington Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. German Loan Society v. KernOregon Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API