Legal Opinion
Fedders Financial Corp. v. Director, Division of Taxation
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 4, 1984Published
1Opinion of the Court
96 N.J. 376 (1984)
476 A.2d 741
FEDDERS FINANCIAL CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued November 9, 1983.
Decided June 4, 1984.
Peter C. Aslanides argued the cause for appellant (McCarter & English, attorneys; Michael A. Guariglia, on the brief).
Harry Haushalter, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; James J. Ciancia, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).
Kevin J. Coakley submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae Hilton…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Bingler v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- National Muffler Dealers Assn., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mayflower Securities Co. v. Bureau of SecuritiesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.