Legal Opinion

Budd v. Walker

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1889Published

Appeal from a judgment of the general term affirming a judgment of the special term.

1Opinion of the CourtDanforth, J.

The action is for an accounting, because <1), as the complaint states, on the 22d of January, 1859, the “plaintiff intrusted to’’the defendant’s testator “ $953.72, which sum the testator shortly thereafter informed her he had invested for her at seven per cent, per annum.” A like statément is made in the complaint as to a further sum of $1,000, said to have been intrusted to him on or about April, 1867. But no further notice need be taken of this item, for it does not appear to have been allowed to the plaintiff nor is it the subject of consideration by either party upon these appeals.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. . HutchinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  2. Benedict v. HecoxNew York Supreme Court · 1837

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API