S.S. v. Wakefield
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Chief Justice.
In this original proceeding we are asked to determine whether a judge of the Denver Juvenile Court should be disqualified from presiding over a dependency and neglect proceeding on the basis of bias or prejudice after initiating an ex parte communication with the respondent mother, S.S., for the purpose of informing her that her court-appointed attorney might not be providing her with effective representation. We issued a rule to show cause and now discharge the rule.
I
S.S.was named as a respondent in a dependency proceeding filed after her child allegedly suffered a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, In the Interest of M.M., a Child, and concerning C.M.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Hayslip v. DouglasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Rodriguez v. District Court for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Payne v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- People v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Moody v. CorsentinoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Holland v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- People ex rel. T.D.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. JulienSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- People ex rel. L.B.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.