Charlie Williams v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtBenton, J.
On direct appeal, Charlie Williams contends his convictions for tampering with a witness, in violation of section 914.22(1), Florida Statutes (2012), should be reversed because the instructions the jury were given constituted fundamental error. He contends the jury instructions permitted— and, indeed, required — a guilty verdict even for lawful conduct. Persuaded, we reverse judgment and sentence alike and remand for a new trial.
On remand, Mr. Williams cannot, of course, be retried on the count on which he was acquitted, a charge of lewd or lascivious molestation of a victim twelve years of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Haygood v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- Armstrong v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Daniels v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- Gerds v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Arnold Jerome Knight v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Facin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Gammage v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Anthony Bernard Brown v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Beharry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.