Legal Opinion

Charlie Williams v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 9, 2014No. 1D13-4240PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBenton, J.

On direct appeal, Charlie Williams contends his convictions for tampering with a witness, in violation of section 914.22(1), Florida Statutes (2012), should be reversed because the instructions the jury were given constituted fundamental error. He contends the jury instructions permitted— and, indeed, required — a guilty verdict even for lawful conduct. Persuaded, we reverse judgment and sentence alike and remand for a new trial.

On remand, Mr. Williams cannot, of course, be retried on the count on which he was acquitted, a charge of lewd or lascivious molestation of a victim twelve years of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. Haygood v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
  3. Armstrong v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  4. Daniels v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
  5. Gerds v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1953

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Arnold Jerome Knight v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. Facin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  3. Gammage v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  4. Anthony Bernard Brown v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  5. Beharry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API