Legal Opinion

Townsend v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 17, 1987No. 6-86-059-CRPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLEIL, Justice.

Donnell Townsend appeals his conviction for burglary of a building. He contends that the prosecutor’s use of peremptory strikes to remove all eight black persons from the jury panel violated his rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. We find no violation of his rights and affirm.

On April 28, 1986, the prosecutor and defense counsel conducted a brief voir dire examination of the jury panel. The prosecutor asked only one question of an individual, who was not a black person. Subsequently, the prosecutor used eight of the ten peremptory…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Strauder v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lockett v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Puckett v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Batiste v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Johnson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Spann v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API