Legal Opinion
Flannigan v. Stauss
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided March 19, 1907PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court for Walwortb county ^E. B. BeldeN, Circuit Judge. In an action for slander tbe respondent recovered a verdict for $500 against tbe appellant in tbe circuit court for Wal- • worth county and judgment was accordingly entered, from ■which this appeal is taken.
1Opinion of the CourtTimlin, J.
The appellant assigns two errors for which he contends the judgment should be reversed.
“Eirst. The court erred in its charge to the jury.” This very general assignment of error is attempted to be supported by a very general exception as follows: “The above-named defendant . . . excepts to the judge’s charge to the jury in the above entitled action.” This exception was filed with the clerk, but is not incorporated in the bill of exceptions otherwise than by the following recital: “To which instructions the defendant duly excepted and which exception was in writing duly filed before the close…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bigelow v. West Wisconsin Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- Corcoran v. HarranWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Bouck v. EnosWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Donovan v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
- Thrasher v. TyackWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nelson v. PauliWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Webb v. Call Publishing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Haueter v. MartyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912