Legal Opinion · Dissent

Heiner v. Donnan

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 21, 1932No. 514Published

1DissentJustice Stone

I think the tax involved in this and its companion case, Handy v. Delaware Trust Co., post, p. 352, is in all respects *333valid, and that the certified questions in both cases should be answered in the negative.

The present federal estate tax, enacted in 1916, Title II of the Revenue Act of 1916, c. 463, 39 Stat. 777, has been continued in each successive Revenue Act. Although levied upon the privilege of transferring property passing at death and imposed on the estates of decedents, the prescribed tax was not limited to such transfers. • By § 202 (b) and (c) of the 1916 Act it was extended to…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  4. Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API