Legal Opinion

State v. Stanfill

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 8, 2000No. 97CR1249FE; CA A99898Published

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

Defendant appeals a conviction for felony driving while revoked. ORS 811.175(l)(a); ORS 811.182(3)(a) (1997).1 He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of a motion to exclude evidence of the underlying driver’s license revocation. The issue is whether, under ORS 809.650 and ORS 809.660, a habitual offender revocation continues indefinitely until the Department of Transportation (Department) affirmatively restores driving privileges. We conclude that it does and that the trial court therefore correctly admitted the challenged evidence. Consequently, we affirm.

In 1990, the Department…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. Hammerton/WalmsleyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. DanielsOregon Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API