Legal Opinion · Dissent

Reilly v. AAA Mid-Atlantic Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 14, 2008No. A-122 September Term 2006Published

1DissentJustice Rivera-Soto

As defined by the majority, this case involves a simple issue: “whether, and under what circumstances, a driver who is involved in a single-vehicle accident may be considered to be ‘at-fault’ for purposes of assessing insurance eligibility rating points.” Ante at 487, 946 A.2d at 567. Because, after full briefing and argument, that issue does not strike me as worthy of consideration on a petition for certification, and because I am of the view that the analysis, reasoning, and conclusions reached by the Appellate Division were correct, I respectfully dissent.

Certification should be granted…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reilly v. AAA Mid-Atlantic InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API