Morelock v. Morgan & Bird Gravel Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1DissentO’Niell, C. J.
I do not subscribe to the ruling on either of the oppositions to the account or statement filed by the receiver.
I do not find any warrant for the ruling that the expression, in Act No. 199 of 1914 and Act No. 7 of 1926, save and excepting “the vendor’s lien and privilege which may be outstanding,” does not mean a vendor’s lien on movable property, but means only a vendor’s. lien on immovable property. The statute is dealing with the lien on both hinds of property, because its language is: “The sum so obtained shall bear a privilege on all of the property real or personal and the income of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Succession of CooleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1874
- Succession of BouvetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1873