Mutual Reserve Fund Life Assn. v. Hamlin
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan
delivered the. opinion of the court.
This action is based upon a certificate of life insurance. There was a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the beneficiary in the contract of insurance. The' refusal of the court to direct a verdict for the defendant and its rulings upon questions of law occurring at the trial constitute the general grounds upon which a reversal of the judgment is sought.
The Mutual Reserve Fund Life Association, the defendant below, was organized under, the laws of New York “to promote the well-being of its members and to furnish substantial aid to their…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Aiken v. Atlantic Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Insurance Co. v. HydeTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
- Kavanaugh v. Security Trust & Life InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
- Wichita Home Ins. Co. v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Winters Mut. Aid Ass'n v. CorumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.