Egan v. Sweeney
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtThomas A. Aurelio, J.
This controversy was submitted to the court for decision upon an agreed statement of facts, the essentials of which are as follows:
The plaintiff and defendant, Flora Mae Sweeney, were married in 1925. On June 25,1926 they acquired title, as tenants by the entirety, to a one-family residence. In 1944 the parties were separated and an agreement executed by them provided, in part, as follows: ‘ ‘ The parties hereto now being co-owners *346of premises number 248-47 88th Road, Bellerose, New York City, presently occupied by the husband, do hereby agree that the husband shall continue to occupy said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Yax v. YaxNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Albin v. AlbinNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- In re the Estate of HazleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- Slade v. Louis Hornick Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1947
- Binkley v. Morden, New York County Courts1962
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jemzura v. JemzuraNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Butler v. RaffertyNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Heitzman v. HeitzmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- D'Addario v. CavotoCivil Court of the City of New York · 1974