Legal Opinion

Porter v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1977No. 76-845PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

The basic issue in the instant cause concerns the appropriate factors to be considered in the valuation of real property for tax assessment purposes where the land in question is zoned for less profitable uses as compared with neighboring lands zoned for more profitable uses.4

*311Section 2, Article XII of the Ohio Constitution, directs that “land * * * shall be taxed by uniform rule according to value.” The term “value” as used in this constitutional provision has been defined as the amount at which property could be sold to a willing buyer by a willing seller on the open market. State, ex rel.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Park Investment Co. v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. American Steel & Wire Co. of New Jersey v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  3. B. F. Keith Columbus Co. v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Kensington Hills Dev. Co. v. Milford Twp. and Milford VillageMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Hedberg & Sons Co. v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Woda Ivy Glen Ltd. Partnership v. Fayette County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Health Care REIT, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Muirfield Ass'n v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Notestine Manor, Inc. v. Logan Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Cleveland Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API