Handford v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
The question attempted to be presented by the parties in the appeal at bar, though not by the record, is whether the United States is barred from filing1 a claim based on fraud by Section 57, sub. n of the Bankruptcy Act as amended, 11 U.S.C.A. § 93 sub. n. The court below, affirming a decision of the referee in bankruptcy, held that the claim of the United States was barred by the statute cited. The appeal at bar followed.
The record in the case at bar is so incomplete that we have had great difficulty in attempting to ascertain the operative facts and even now are not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hi-Flier Mfg. Co. v. HabermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- In Re Dorb the Chemist Pharmacies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- In re Credit Service, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1941
- In re Credit Service, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1942
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Dejay Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- Sampsell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952